Submitted by Sarah Cooke on Fri, Apr 03, 2009 - 10:00 pm
Posted in
Have you been confused about the terms “green” and “sustainable”? I have. Even when I'm clear on what I think they mean, I’m never quite sure what someone else thinks they mean. Have we reached a point where these words have become such a cliché that they don’t mean anything at all?
Based on research presented in a recent article by Scientific American, the answer is a resounding YES for the term “Green” , and in an even worse state: the phrase “going green” – they have lost any clear meaning beyond a vague sense of environmental virtue.
“Sustainable”, on the other hand, remains clearly defined.
The modern use of “sustainable” and the resultant sustainability movement was entered our lexicon in 1987 with the publication of Our Common Future by the United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (also known as the Brundtland commission report). The meaning remains unchanged today.
The Brundtland commission report defined sustainable development as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” Or, as Scientific American astutely summarizes into the words of countless kindergarten teachers, “Don’t take more than your share.”
It is important to note that sustainability is not just about the environment but also economics, social equity, and human rights. In the Brundtland report, this was reflected through a focus on finding ways for poor countries catch up to richer countries in terms of standard of living.
As a result, “sustainable” is not a synonym for “green”. Although there is a fair amount of overlap between the two terms, “green” is typically used to suggests a preference for the natural over the artificial. To help clarify the difference between the two terms, consider the many positive solutions to protecting and bettering our world that rely on technological developments i.e. wind turbines, solar cells, electric cars. Many can hardly be called “green” as they are certainly not naturally occuring, but can easily be recognized as “sustainable”.
Now that we know what we’re saying when we use these words, set aside a few minutes to read Scientific American’s article, Top 10 Myths About Sustainability, including discussion of cost, technology, population, how to best drive systemic change, and more.
- Sarah Cooke's blog
- Login or register to post comments
You might be interested in...
Related Post(s):
- Understanding Sustainability Within The Event Industry
- Action for a Sustainable America - Seattle, WA
- Austin Green Living & Home Products Expo
- Conscious Consumerism: Holiday Gifting Strategies for Positive Impact
- Newsletter: Volume 1, Issue 5: August 2008
- Being Green: The Challenges and Rewards of Pursuing Sustainability
- Sustainable Blind Wine Tasting: And the winner is….???
- 5th Annual Sustainable Business Summit
- Sustainable Wine Tasting
- Austin Corporate Sustainability Leadeship (CSL) Consortium







